Sophie Hines Median Knickers

Of course, I can provide an in-depth analysis of sewing and fitting underwear! I finally tried out Sophie Hines’s Median knicker pattern and was not disappointed.

Analyzing Style

I don’t have a center grainline to study, but I thought it would be interesting to look at some of the features of the Median knickers. The underwear has a high waist, so it should sit at or above your belly button. The knickers also have full coverage for your butt, and the crotch is cut wide to help everything stay in place.

As you will find out, I actually went up a size for my pattern pieces, which got me wondering about the drafting of the pattern. I was curious and made some plots. First, I plotted the body measurements for the waist and full hips for each size and compared the difference. I didn’t have any hypotheses and wasn’t expecting to find anything. I was simply curious to see the distribution of body measurements for the pattern across sizes. The waist and hips increase linearly for the smaller sizes (XXS – M). There’s a 2-inch difference between the sizes and a consistent ratio of 10 inches between the waist and hip measurements. For the larger sizes (L – 3X), the waist and full hips increase more, and the waist-to-hip ratio is larger too. From sizes M to 1X there’s a 3-inch difference between sizes, and from sizes 1X to 3X there’s a 4-inch difference. This difference will impact how you select a size, especially if you are “between” sizes. I don’t think you can immediately claim to size down.

Next, I plotted the waist body measurement versus the waistband elastic measurement to see if there was or was not consistent negative ease across the sizes. When I plotted the data, they showed variable negative ease across the sizes. For example, the waistband elastic for size XXS is cut 1 inch smaller than the body measurement. However, for the 3X size, the waistband elastic is 4 inches smaller than the body measurement. This is why if you are between sizes or just unsure about your size, look at the waist and leg band elastic to aid in your decision instead of automatically sizing down.

Finally, I compared the leg band elastic measurement with the full hip measurement divided by 2. I understand that taking half the hip measurement is not the same as the girth around the upper thigh, but I thought this figure was insightful nonetheless. The pattern does not include upper thigh body measurements, so halving the hip measurement is the closest option. Not sure what is going on with sizes M and L, but all other sizes have a 1-inch negative ease for the leg band. I think upper thigh measurement is more important and helpful than full hip measurement for determining the correct size for this pattern.

Determining the Correct Size

Here are my current body measurements: waist at my natural waistline is 34 inches, and my full hip is 44 inches. However, let’s take some additional measurements. At the level I want my waistband to actually sit, I measure 38 inches. Around my upper thigh is 26.5 inches. I found that these latter measurements are more helpful in determining the correct size.

If using just my natural waist (34 inches) and full hip (44 inches) measurements, that would suggest I need to make a size 1X. However, I found this size too small, particularly around the leg opening. If I use my preferred waistband measurement (38 inches), this suggests I should make a size 2X.

Now, if I consider my upper thigh measurement of 26.5 inches and compare that to the leg band length, I can see that size 1X gives me 5 inches of negative ease (26.5 – 21.5 = 5). That means the leg band has to stretch 5 inches to fit! I’m guessing I need 2-3 inches of negative ease at most for my leg band. Size 2X would give me 3 inches of negative ease (26.5 – 23.5 = 3). Between my updated waistband measurement and the leg band negative ease, I made a size 2X and not a size 1X.